Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Apr 2016

Response of Iron Deficiency Anemia to Intravenous Iron Sucrose in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

MD, PhD
Page Range: 162 – 168
DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-21.2.162
Save
Download PDF

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous iron sucrose (IS) in iron deficient children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in remission.

METHODS: Electronic medical records at a university based pediatric children's hospital were searched for patients in age range 0 to 18 years with diagnosis of IBD and treatment with IS over a 1-year period. Response to IS treatment was assessed by posttreatment changes in ferritin, hemoglobin (Hb), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV). Patients with recorded symptoms of active disease were excluded from analysis of treatment response.

RESULTS: Twelve patients were identified by the search criteria, 10 with Crohn's disease (CD), 2 with ulcerative colitis (UC). Data represent 8 patients in remission, 7 with CD and 1 with UC, who received a total of 34 IS infusions. Iron sucrose was administered in cycles of 2 infusions, 2.5 to 3.5 mg/kg/dose (maximum 200 mg), 1 week apart. Mean ferritin increased from 21.4 ± 9.2 to 52.9 ± 10.1 ng/mL (p = 0.0005), Hb from 10.9 ± 0.4 to 11.3 ± 0.3 g/dL (p = 0.02), and MCV from 76.9 ± 2 to 79.4 ± 2 fl (p = 0.006). Iron sucrose treatment normalized ferritin in 6 of 7, Hb in 2 of 8, and MCV in 2 of 5 patients with low pretreatment levels. No adverse effects were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS: Two IS infusions of 2.5 to 3.5 mg/kg/dose (maximum 200 mg), given 1 week apart normalized ferritin levels in most pediatric IBD patients in remission without adverse effects. Further studies are needed to determine optimal dosing schedules.

INTRODUCTION

Anemia is the most common systemic complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It affects up to 70% of pediatric patients1 and tends to persist and impact quality of life regardless of disease activity.2 Iron deficiency is the main contributor to anemia in IBD. In a recent study 70% of children with Crohn's disease (CD) and 65% of children with ulcerative colitis (UC) were iron deficient 2 years after diagnosis,3 indicating that the problem is underdiagnosed and/or undertreated.

Current recommendations for iron supplementation in pediatric IBD emphasize oral formulations4 but compliance is poor due to gastrointestinal side effects.56 The adult literature favors the intravenous (IV) route of administration.7 Recently both an earlier and larger role for IV iron in pediatric patients has been proposed.8 Despite the favorable adult experience, IV iron therapy continues to be rarely used in children with IBD and the literature is sparse on this subject. One study on IV iron dextran in pediatric IBD patients reported good efficacy with a 9% frequency of hypersensitivity reactions, none of which were life-threatening.9 Nevertheless, the reluctance to use IV iron in children with IBD persists, likely due to concerns about serious hypersensitivity reactions.

Iron sucrose (IS), the most widely used and well-studied IV iron supplement in adults with IBD10 is a potential alternative to iron dextran. With iron sucrose adverse effects are rare, dose dependent, and thought to result from vasoactive reaction to circulating free iron rather than anaphylaxis.1112 Release of free iron may occur when large doses are administered.11 Within the recommended dosage range, IS has an excellent record of safety and efficiency in the treatment of anemia in children with chronic renal failure1314 and several other conditions.512

Data on response to IS are available for adults,15 but not for children with IBD. To fill this gap, we conducted a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of IS treatments in our pediatric IBD patients over a 1-year period.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at the American Family Children's Hospital, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health and was approved by the institutional review board. The primary objective was to review IS dosing regimens and treatment responses in children with IBD followed by the author at a university-based pediatric gastroenterology clinic.

Patients were identified in UW HealthLink, a web-based application within the Epic electronic health record, by matching International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 555 (CD), 556 (UC), 558.9 (other and unspecified noninfectious gastroenteritis and colitis) with age range 0 to 18 years and medication orders for IS over a 1-year period. The patient list obtained was cross-checked with the divisional database for IBD patients.

Data collected included demographic information, medical history, treatment and status of patients' IBD, IS dosing schedules, adverse reactions, folate and B12 levels, pre- and post-treatment ferritin, hemoglobin (Hb), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Labs obtained within 2 weeks preceding the first IS infusion and at least 2, but not later than 6 weeks following the last IS infusion were considered pre- and posttreatment, respectively. C-reactive protein levels from the same periods were used to determine if ferritin levels are comparable and are not skewed by acute phase response.7

Ferritin <30 ng/mL was considered consistent with iron deficiency in IBD patients without evidence of active disease in accordance with the literature.716 Anemia and microcytosis were defined as Hb and MCV < mean −2 SD for age.

Treatment response was analyzed from patients who were in clinical remission and had CRP levels within 1 mg/dL from the start of IS treatment to follow-up studies. Pre- and post-treatment ferritin, Hb, and MCV levels were summarized in terms of means and ± standard errors. Changes in ferritin, Hb, and MCV from pre- to posttreatment were evaluated using a paired t-test. Analogously, changes in the proportions of subjects with normal ferritin, Hb, and MCV were analyzed using a paired McNemar's test. Due to the small sample size, exact p-values were calculated with a network algorithm.17 All p-values are 2-sided and p < 0.05 was used for defining statistical significance.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were identified by the search criteria. Subject demographic characteristics and clinical data are found in the Table.

Table. Individual Patient Characteristics
Table.

Mean patient age was 15.4 years (range 10–18 years), 9 patients (75%) were female, 10 patients (83%) had the diagnosis of CD, and 2 (17%) had UC. Both patients with UC were females. At the time of IS infusions, patients had been on various maintenance treatments including azathioprine, methotrexate, adalimumab (Humira, AbbVie, Inc, North Chicago, IL), infliximab (Remicade, Janssen Biotech, Inc, Titusville, NJ), mesalamine, and exclusive enteral nutrition. One patient (K) had been on azathioprine at the beginning of the study period and later was switched to methotrexate due to side effects. None of the patients had B12 or folate deficiency (data not shown).

A total of 48 IS (Venofer, American Regent, Inc, Shirley, NY) infusions were administered using the following protocol: Venofer 20 mg elemental iron/mL containing the desired amount of iron was diluted in 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline. The solution was infused IV over 30 to 60 minutes. The number of infusions received by individual patients throughout the 1-year study period ranged from 2 to 8. Doses of IS per infusion ranged from 2.1 to 5 mg/kg. The maximum single IS dose allowed was 200 mg.

Nine out of 12 patients were in remission and received IS sucrose in treatment cycles consisting of 2 infusions 1 week apart (total of 36 infusions). Eight of these patients who had both pre- and posttreatment ferritin, Hb, and MCV available for comparison are included in the analysis of treatment response. Three patients (“A”, “E,” and “J”) had different dosing regimens, and/or had significant changes in disease activity between the time of IS treatments and follow-up labs. Patient “A” received two 5 mg/kg IS infusions 1 day apart, patient “E” received multiple 2.2 mg/kg IS infusions administered either every other day or more than 1 week apart. Patient “A” received IS shortly after diagnosis of her CD and was in remission by the time of follow-up labs with decrease in her CRP from 34 to 0 mg/dL. Patient “J” had Clostridium difficile infection and associated flare of her UC at the time of IS infusions and recovered by the time of follow up labs with decrease in CRP from 6 to 0.6 mg/dL (data not shown). To allow assessment of similar dosing schedules and avoid confounding effect of changes in inflammatory activity on ferritin levels patients “A,” “E,” and “J” were excluded from analysis of treatment response and the corresponding areas in the Table are shaded.

Ferritin levels increased in all patients, mean increase ranged from 13.2 to 63.3 ng/mL. Hb increased in 6 patients, and increases ranged from 0.3 to 1.2 g/dL. MCV increased in all patients following treatment with mean increases in individual patients ranging from 0.3 to 6.4 fl (Table).

Figures 1 through 3 show mean pre- and post-treatment laboratory values, percent change in laboratory values by individual patient and the percentage of patients with normal values before and after treatment. Data represent 8 patients in remission, 7 with CD and 1 with UC, who received total of 34 IS infusions.

Figure 1. (A) Columns show mean ferritin level from all patients before and after iron sucrose treatments. Bars show standard error. Lines show changes in average pre- and posttreatment ferritin levels by individual patient. (B) Columns show percent changes in ferritin from baseline after treatment. (C) Darker fill in columns show percentage of patients with normal ferritin levels before (left column) and after (right column) iron sucrose treatment.Figure 1. (A) Columns show mean ferritin level from all patients before and after iron sucrose treatments. Bars show standard error. Lines show changes in average pre- and posttreatment ferritin levels by individual patient. (B) Columns show percent changes in ferritin from baseline after treatment. (C) Darker fill in columns show percentage of patients with normal ferritin levels before (left column) and after (right column) iron sucrose treatment.Figure 1. (A) Columns show mean ferritin level from all patients before and after iron sucrose treatments. Bars show standard error. Lines show changes in average pre- and posttreatment ferritin levels by individual patient. (B) Columns show percent changes in ferritin from baseline after treatment. (C) Darker fill in columns show percentage of patients with normal ferritin levels before (left column) and after (right column) iron sucrose treatment.
Figure 1. (A) Columns show mean ferritin level from all patients before and after iron sucrose treatments. Bars show standard error. Lines show changes in average pre- and posttreatment ferritin levels by individual patient. (B) Columns show percent changes in ferritin from baseline after treatment. (C) Darker fill in columns show percentage of patients with normal ferritin levels before (left column) and after (right column) iron sucrose treatment.

Citation: The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics 21, 2; 10.5863/1551-6776-21.2.162

Figure 2. (A) Columns show mean hemoglobin level from all patients before and after iron sucrose treatments. Bars show standard error. Lines show changes in average pre- and posttreatment hemoglobin by individual patient. (B) Columns show percent changes in hemoglobin from baseline after treatment. (C) Darker fill in columns show percentage of patients with normal serum hemoglobin before (left column) and after (right column) iron sucrose treatment.Figure 2. (A) Columns show mean hemoglobin level from all patients before and after iron sucrose treatments. Bars show standard error. Lines show changes in average pre- and posttreatment hemoglobin by individual patient. (B) Columns show percent changes in hemoglobin from baseline after treatment. (C) Darker fill in columns show percentage of patients with normal serum hemoglobin before (left column) and after (right column) iron sucrose treatment.Figure 2. (A) Columns show mean hemoglobin level from all patients before and after iron sucrose treatments. Bars show standard error. Lines show changes in average pre- and posttreatment hemoglobin by individual patient. (B) Columns show percent changes in hemoglobin from baseline after treatment. (C) Darker fill in columns show percentage of patients with normal serum hemoglobin before (left column) and after (right column) iron sucrose treatment.
Figure 2. (A) Columns show mean hemoglobin level from all patients before and after iron sucrose treatments. Bars show standard error. Lines show changes in average pre- and posttreatment hemoglobin by individual patient. (B) Columns show percent changes in hemoglobin from baseline after treatment. (C) Darker fill in columns show percentage of patients with normal serum hemoglobin before (left column) and after (right column) iron sucrose treatment.

Citation: The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics 21, 2; 10.5863/1551-6776-21.2.162

Figure 3. (A) Columns show mean mean corpuscular volume (MCV) from all patients before and after iron sucrose treatments. Bars show standard error. Lines show changes in average pre- and posttreatment MCV by individual patient. (B) Columns show percent changes in MCV from baseline after treatment. (C) Darker fill in columns show percentage of patients with normal MCV before (left column) and after (right column) iron sucrose treatment.Figure 3. (A) Columns show mean mean corpuscular volume (MCV) from all patients before and after iron sucrose treatments. Bars show standard error. Lines show changes in average pre- and posttreatment MCV by individual patient. (B) Columns show percent changes in MCV from baseline after treatment. (C) Darker fill in columns show percentage of patients with normal MCV before (left column) and after (right column) iron sucrose treatment.Figure 3. (A) Columns show mean mean corpuscular volume (MCV) from all patients before and after iron sucrose treatments. Bars show standard error. Lines show changes in average pre- and posttreatment MCV by individual patient. (B) Columns show percent changes in MCV from baseline after treatment. (C) Darker fill in columns show percentage of patients with normal MCV before (left column) and after (right column) iron sucrose treatment.
Figure 3. (A) Columns show mean mean corpuscular volume (MCV) from all patients before and after iron sucrose treatments. Bars show standard error. Lines show changes in average pre- and posttreatment MCV by individual patient. (B) Columns show percent changes in MCV from baseline after treatment. (C) Darker fill in columns show percentage of patients with normal MCV before (left column) and after (right column) iron sucrose treatment.

Citation: The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics 21, 2; 10.5863/1551-6776-21.2.162

Mean ferritin increased from 21.4 ± 9.2 to 52.9 ± 10.1 ng/mL (p = 0.0005; Figure 1A). In individual patients, increases in ferritin levels from baseline ranged from 32% to 643% (Figure 1B). All patients except 2 had low ferritin levels prior to treatment. Posttreatment ferritin normalized in all but 1 patient (p = 0.02; Figure 1C).

Mean hemoglobin increased from 10.9 ± 0.4 to 11.3 ± 0.3 g/dL (p = 0.02; Figure 2A). In individual patients increases in Hb from baseline ranged from 3.4% to 13.8%. In 2 patients, post-treatment Hb was below baseline by 0.4% and 1.9%, respectively (Figure 2B). All patients had low Hb prior to treatment. Hb normalized in 2 of 8 patients after IS treatment (p = not significant [NS]; Figure 2C).

Mean mean corpuscular volume increased from 76.9 ± 2 to 79.4 ± 2 fl (p = 0.006; Figure 3A). In individual patients, increases in MCV from baseline ranged from 0.3% to 7.8% (Figure 2B). Mean corpuscular volume was normal in 3 of 8 patients before and in 5 of 8 patients after IS treatment (p = NS; Figure 3C).

No adverse drug reactions were documented or reported with any of the 48 IS infusions. There were no clinical infections following IS treatment. Transferrin saturations remained <50% in all patients (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge this is the first report of IS treatment of iron deficiency anemia in children with IBD. Two doses of 2.5 to 3.5 mg/kg (up to 200 mg) IS 1 week apart significantly increased ferritin levels in children with IBD in remission. None of the patients experienced any adverse events. Anemia and microcytosis improved, but did not necessarily normalize along with ferritin, possibly in part due to confounding anemia of chronic disease.

Iron deficiency anemia has significant negative impact on quality of life, development, and cognition in children and adolescents.2 At the same time, despite high prevalence of iron deficiency anemia12 and poor compliance with oral iron supplements,56 IV iron is used infrequently in pediatric IBD. In a recent survey of IS use for indications other than chronic renal failure in a large pediatric center, only 3 out of 38 patients had the diagnosis of IBD.12

The reluctance to use IV iron is largely related to concerns about anaphylactic reactions.8 The stigma of risk seems to be equally attached to all IV iron formulations and the safety and ease of use of IS may not be fully appreciated by physicians caring for children with IBD. Among the IV iron preparations available in the United States, IS was found to carry the lowest risk for hypersensitivity reactions18 and has been found to be safe even in patients with a previous reaction to iron dextran.19 Although our numbers are too small to draw far-reaching conclusions, our findings are in agreement with these studies on the safety of IS.

The need for multiple infusions to replace total iron deficit is a limitation of IS. Unfortunately, formulations that allow total dose IV iron infusion carry higher risk of anaphylactic reaction (iron dextran18) or are not approved for children (ferumoxytol, ferric carboxymaltose). In the 2 larger series on IS in children outside the chronic renal failure population,512 total iron deficit was calculated by various accepted formulas also used in chronic renal failure2021 and replaced in doses of 5 mg/kg/dose 3 times weekly,5 or in 7 mg/kg doses up to a maximum single dose of 300 mg every 3 to 7 days.12 Our findings suggest that less aggressive dosage schemes could also be effective in treatment or prevention of mild to moderate iron deficiency in patients who are non-compliant with oral iron supplements. Incorporation of IS into routine management of iron deficiency would be especially easy in patients who need periodic IV access for infliximab treatment. Many of these patients are otherwise well and at risk of untreated iron deficiency anemia with deleterious effects on their quality of life and school performance. Further studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of this approach and determine optimal dosing.

Acknowledgments

Statistical analysis by Jens C. Eickhoff, PhD, help of Stacey C. Moyer, MSN, RN, with institutional review board submission, and comments from Sharon Bartosh, MD, and Luther Sigurdsson, MD, are greatly appreciated. Results were presented in poster form at the NASPGHAN Annual Meeting, October 10–12, 2013, in Chicago, IL.

Abbreviations:

CD

Crohn's disease

CRP

C-reactive protein

Hb

hemoglobin

IBD

inflammatory bowel disease

IS

iron sucrose

IV

intravenous

MCV

mean corpuscular volume

UC

ulcerative colitis

REFERENCES

  • 1.
    Goodhand JR,
    Kamperidis N,
    Rao A,
    et al. Prevalence and management of anemia in children, adolescents, and adults with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18(
    3
    ):513519.
  • 2.
    Cronin CC,
    Shanahan F.
    Anemia in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(
    8
    ):22962298.
  • 3.
    Wiskin AE,
    Fleming BJ,
    Wootton SA,
    et al. Anaemia and iron deficiency in children with inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2012;6(
    6
    ):687691.
  • 4.
    Thayu M,
    Mamula P.
    Treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2005;8(
    5
    ):411417.
  • 5.
    Pinsk V,
    Levy J,
    Moser A,
    et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous iron sucrose therapy in a group of children with iron deficiency anemia. Israel Med Assoc J. 2008;10(
    5
    ):335338.
  • 6.
    Schroder O,
    Mickisch O,
    Seidler U,
    et al. Intravenous iron sucrose versus oral iron supplementation for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease--a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(
    11
    ):25032509.
  • 7.
    Gasche C,
    Berstad A,
    Befrits R,
    et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of iron deficiency and anemia in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13(
    12
    ): 15451553.
  • 8.
    Auerbach M.
    Should intravenous iron be upfront therapy for iron deficiency anemia? Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56(
    4
    ):511512.
  • 9.
    Mamula P,
    Piccoli DA,
    Peck SN,
    et al. Total dose intravenous infusion of iron dextran for iron-deficiency anemia in children with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;34(
    3
    ):286290.
  • 10.
    Stein J,
    Hartmann F,
    Dignass AU.
    Diagnosis and management of iron deficiency anemia in patients with IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7(
    11
    ):599610.
  • 11.
    Chandler G,
    Harchowal J,
    Macdougall IC.
    Intravenous iron sucrose: establishing a safe dose. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38(
    5
    ):988991.
  • 12.
    Crary SE,
    Hall K,
    Buchanan GR.
    Intravenous iron sucrose for children with iron deficiency failing to respond to oral iron therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56(
    4
    ):615619.
  • 13.
    Kosch M,
    Bahner U,
    Bettger H,
    et al. A randomized, controlled parallel-group trial on efficacy and safety of iron sucrose (Venofer) vs iron gluconate (Ferrlecit) in haemodialysis patients treated with rhuepo. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16(
    6
    ):12391244.
  • 14.
    Morgan HE,
    Holt RC,
    Jones CA,
    et al. Intravenous iron treatment in paediatric chronic kidney disease patients not on erythropoietin. Pediatr Nephrol. 2007;22(
    11
    ):19631965.
  • 15.
    Bodemar G,
    Kechagias S,
    Almer S,
    et al. Treatment of anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease with iron sucrose. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;39(
    5
    ):454458.
  • 16.
    Gisbert JP,
    Gomollon F.
    Common misconceptions in the diagnosis and management of anemia in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(
    5
    ):12991307.
  • 17.
    Mehta CR,
    Patel NR,
    Tsiatis AA.
    Exact significance testing to establish treatment equivalence with ordered categorical data. Biometrics. 1984;40(
    3
    ):819825.
  • 18.
    Bailie GR,
    Clark JA,
    Lane CE,
    et al. Hypersensitivity reactions and deaths associated with intravenous iron preparations. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20(
    7
    ):14431449.
  • 19.
    Van Wyck DB,
    Cavallo G,
    Spinowitz BS,
    et al. Safety and efficacy of iron sucrose in patients sensitive to iron dextran: North American clinical trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;36(
    1
    ):8897.
  • 20.
    Anbu AT,
    Kemp T,
    O'Donnell K,
    et al. Low incidence of adverse events following 90-minute and 3-minute infusions of intravenous iron sucrose in children on erythropoietin. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94(
    12
    ):17381741.
  • 21.
    Lanzkowsky P.
    Iron deficiency anemia. In:
    LanzkowskyP,
    ed. Manual of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology.
    3rd ed
    .
    San Diego, CA
    :
    Academic Press
    ; 2000:3351.

Disclosure The author declares no conflicts or financial interest in any product or service mentioned in the manuscript, including grants, equipment, medications, employment, gifts, and honoraria. The author had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Copyright: © 2016 Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.

(A) Columns show mean ferritin level from all patients before and after iron sucrose treatments. Bars show standard error. Lines show changes in average pre- and posttreatment ferritin levels by individual patient. (B) Columns show percent changes in ferritin from baseline after treatment. (C) Darker fill in columns show percentage of patients with normal ferritin levels before (left column) and after (right column) iron sucrose treatment.


Figure 2.
Figure 2.

(A) Columns show mean hemoglobin level from all patients before and after iron sucrose treatments. Bars show standard error. Lines show changes in average pre- and posttreatment hemoglobin by individual patient. (B) Columns show percent changes in hemoglobin from baseline after treatment. (C) Darker fill in columns show percentage of patients with normal serum hemoglobin before (left column) and after (right column) iron sucrose treatment.


Figure 3.
Figure 3.

(A) Columns show mean mean corpuscular volume (MCV) from all patients before and after iron sucrose treatments. Bars show standard error. Lines show changes in average pre- and posttreatment MCV by individual patient. (B) Columns show percent changes in MCV from baseline after treatment. (C) Darker fill in columns show percentage of patients with normal MCV before (left column) and after (right column) iron sucrose treatment.


Contributor Notes

Correspondence Istvan Danko, MD, PhD, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-4108, email: idanko@pediatrics.wisc.edu
  • Download PDF