Editorial Type: SPECIAL ARTICLES
 | 
Online Publication Date: 19 Aug 2022

Pediatric Perioperative Clinical Pharmacy Practice: Clinical Considerations and Management: An Opinion of the Pediatrics and Perioperative Care Practice and Research Networks of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy

PharmD,
PharmD,
PharmD,
PharmD, and
PhD
Article Category: Research Article
Page Range: 490 – 505
DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-27.6.490
Save
Download PDF

Pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacists are uniquely positioned to provide therapeutic and medication management expertise at a particularly vulnerable transition of care from the preoperative space, through surgery, and postoperative setting. There are many direct-patient care activities that are included in the role of the pediatric perioperative pharmacist, as well as many opportunities to develop effective, optimized, and safe medication use processes. This article outlines many of the areas in which a pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacist may intervene.

Introduction

Clinical pharmacy practice within pediatric perioperative care is an evolving subspecialty. Advancement of invasive and minimally invasive surgical techniques and materials, coupled with strategies to decrease operative stress and improve multidisciplinary perioperative care coordination, has contributed to improved outcomes in children.1 Pharmacists are poised to provide critical recommendations and serve as drug therapy and medication safety experts to this vulnerable population throughout the surgical continuum. Pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacists may participate in a variety of team activities, such as stewardship for fluids, antimicrobial agents, blood factor products, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prevention and treatment, and assessment of pain and analgesic response. All of these activities can contribute to improved clinical outcomes and cost savings to the patient and the health system.2,3

General Pediatric Pharmacy Principles in Perioperative Care

Providing medical care to children requires appreciation of the role that growth and development play not only in physical attributes and cognition, but also in normal physiologic functions. Heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure in children differ from the normal values of adults. Notably higher heart rates and respiratory rates are observed in neonates and infants, and these values reach adult heart and respiratory rates by adolescence. Hypotension is typically defined as a systolic blood pressure below the fifth percentile for age or as <60 mm Hg for term neonates, <70 mm Hg for infants, <70 mm Hg + (2 × age in years) for children 1 to 10 years of age, and <90 mm Hg for children older than 10 years.4 Values are even lower for premature neonates.

The pharmaceutical care of children goes beyond providing fractional doses for the smaller sized patient.5 Drug pharmacokinetics, dosing, and medication delivery and safety considerations in children differ across the age continuum from adult patients.

Pharmacokinetic properties of drugs continue to change, and the child's organ and biotransformation systems continue to develop after birth.6 Volume of distribution changes over time, with neonates and infants having relatively high total body water spaces and larger extracellular fluid compartments. This volume of distribution coupled with lower circulating plasma proteins may increase the free fraction of drugs in the neonate and young infant. Total body water and body fat in children approximate adult values typically in the second decade of life. The capacity of drug metabolism varies by age as well. Phase I and II metabolizing enzymes develop at different rates in children. The neonate and infant are most susceptible to prolonged half-life of certain medications owing to delayed biotransformation. Glomerular filtration and tubular secretion are also delayed at birth, but approach adult capacity by the first year of life, and at times may exceed adults in the first decade of life.6 Glomerular hyperfiltration or augmented renal clearance is also a phenomenon reported in critically ill children.7

Drug dosing in children is most often calculated as weight based (milligram per kilogram) up to the maximum adult dose (typically >40 kg). Pediatric patients often require the use of enteral liquid formulations owing to the small doses required and a lack of esophageal coordination to swallow tablets and capsules, which necessitates thoughtful formulary management in order to provide medication for children of all ages.8 Additionally, intravenous products often need further dilution in order to provide a measurable dose. The Standardize4Safety Initiative, led by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP), was a US Food and Drug Administration–funded medication safety project to develop and implement standard concentrations and dosing units of measure for intravenous continuous infusions and extemporaneously compounded oral liquids for pediatric patients.9 Similarly, the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) provides best practices for using smart infusion pump and automated dispensing cabinet technology that are applicable in centers caring for children.10,11 Moreover, the ASHP–Pediatric Pharmacy Association (PPA) guidelines for providing pediatric pharmacy services in health systems outlines safe and effective means for satisfying the special needs of pediatric patients.12 Pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacists use these recommendations from ISMP, ASHP, and PPA to assist in creating a safer medication use system for children in the perioperative space.

Enhanced Recovery Pathways

Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) are evidence-based strategies that combine many interventions throughout the perioperative period (pre-, intra-, and post-operative phases) to improve surgical outcomes, such as reduction in complications, length of stay, cost, and improvements in quality of life.13 ERPs have been widely used in adult patients in recent decades, and their application to pediatric surgery is more nascent.14 The most common adult surgeries for ERP implementation include colorectal, orthopedic, and cardiac, and additional pediatric procedures, such as neonatal surgery, are being explored.15 Common elements of ERP include minimization of fasting, avoidance of hyperosmolar bowel preparation and routine placement of nasogastric tubes, early mobilization, and the implementation of multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia.14,16 Research on the contribution of other pharmacotherapy elements, such as prophylaxis for surgical site infections, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and PONV has been proposed.17 Protocol implementation is best accomplished through a step-wise multidisciplinary quality improvement methodology.13,14 The pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacist can advocate for evidence-based medication use throughout the different phases of ERP and encourage expansion of pediatric-specific ERP at their practice site.

Fluids and Electrolytes

The management of fluids and electrolytes is important for maintaining homeostasis in the pediatric patient, especially to prevent fluid overload in the preoperative and early postoperative periods.18 The body's natural mechanisms for maintaining intravascular volume are often inadequate in the surgical patient owing to increased blood, renal, gastrointestinal, and insensible water losses. Goal-directed fluid management strategies facilitate correction of electrolyte deficits, prevent hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, and ensure adequate intravascular volume to maintain cardiac output and tissue oxygen delivery.19

For minor procedures (i.e., those not requiring general anesthesia), a short fasting period will likely not require intravenous fluids for most healthy children. A major exception includes neonates who will require dextrose-containing fluids (most commonly Dextrose 10%) with electrolytes to prevent hypoglycemia if the fasting period is longer than the usual feeding interval (most commonly every 2 to 4 hours). Children undergoing longer and more complicated procedures will require intravenous fluids before, during, and after surgery. The fasting period prior to surgery may vary between centers and by surgery type, but is usually 6 hours for solid food, 4 to 6 hours for formula/breast milk in infants, and 2 hours for clear liquids. The most recent Cochrane review20 concluded that in children with a normal aspiration/regurgitation risk, there was no apparent benefit to withholding clear oral fluids at 2 hours preoperatively compared with 6 hours or more, so clear oral liquids are often encouraged to reduce discomfort from hunger or thirst.

Maintenance fluid rates may be calculated a number of ways, including estimating calorie expenditure and body surface area. One of the most common and simplest methods is the Holliday-Segar method, also known as the “4-2-1 rule.”21 This calculation is shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Holliday-Segar Formula21*
Table 1.

Neonates younger than 44 weeks' postmenstrual age will have differing fluid requirements based on age and other chronic conditions, with maintenance fluid requirements often ranging from 60 to 100 mL/kg/day in the first few days of life, up to 120 to 150 mL/kg/day or more thereafter.22

In addition to maintenance fluids, replacement of intravascular volume losses during surgery is required. This often ranges from 1 to 15 mL/kg/hr depending on the type of surgery, but may even be as high as 50 mL/kg/hr, for example, in premature neonates undergoing surgery for necrotizing enterocolitis due to significant trauma and ischemic bowel.22,23 Maximal allowable blood loss for any surgery is calculated by using the following equation: in which “Hb initial” is starting hemoglobin, “Hb low” is the lowest acceptable hemoglobin threshold without red cell transfusion, and “EBV” is the patient's estimated circulating blood volume. Table 2 lists the estimated circulating blood volume by patient age. Surgeries associated with higher blood volume loss in children include cardiac, liver transplant, scoliosis, craniosynostosis, and trauma-related surgeries. In general for children, 1 mL of blood loss is replaced with 1 mL of colloid or 1.5 mL of crystalloid.22

Table 2. Estimated Circulating Blood Volume in Infants and Children24
Table 2.

Fluid selection is important for maintaining fluid, electrolyte, and glucose homeostasis. As mentioned previously, neonates and young infants will require generally Dextrose 10% or greater to prevent hypoglycemia. Older pediatric patients at high risk for hypoglycemia include those who have parenteral nutrition-dependence, certain endocrine disorders, low body weight, or longer surgery durations. In older infants and children, Dextrose 5% is appropriate in those with adequate nutritional status. Non-dextrose containing fluids (such as Lactated Ringer) or lower dextrose concentrations may be used intraoperatively to prevent hyperglycemia; however, dextrose-containing solutions should be used postoperatively to prevent hypoglycemia.22,25 With regard to electrolytes, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that maintenance fluids for patients aged 28 days to 18 years be isotonic to prevent hyponatremia and include potassium and dextrose (for example, Dextrose 5% with 0.9% sodium chloride and potassium chloride 20 mEq/L).19 Neonates may require hypotonic fluids (such as Dextrose 10% with 0.2% sodium chloride) owing to the immaturity of their kidneys and large free water needs. A reasonable approach for a neonate who is already stable on maintenance fluids would be to continue this fluid during surgery and add a balanced salt solution, colloid, or blood product when needed for replacement of fluid losses.

Overall, an awareness of the unique needs of pediatric and neonatal patients to maintain intravascular volume, euglycemia, and prevent electrolyte derangements is important for the pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacist to ensure optimal outcomes for patients.

Antimicrobials

The pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacist can play an active role in antimicrobial stewardship through recommendations and optimal dosing and timing of perioperative antibiotics. In 2013, ASHP, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, Surgical Infection Society, and Society of Healthcare Epidemiology of America published a clinical practice guideline for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery, with cefazolin as the preferred prophylaxis agent in most cases.26 The guidelines offer drug selection and dosing in adults (>18 years of age) and pediatric patients aged 1 to 18 years. From a stewardship perspective, Laituri and Arnold27 provide a cogent summary of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical neonates. Special consideration for this patient population includes the higher volume of distribution of water-soluble antimicrobials and the potential for altered elimination and prolonged half-lives from immature renal and hepatic routes. However, the same administration principles apply to children of all ages: the antimicrobial agent should be initiated within 60 minutes of surgical incision; additional intraoperative dosing is indicated if the procedure duration exceeds 2 half-lives of the antibiotic or there is significant blood loss.26

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

In 2020, an updated consensus guideline for the management of PONV was released. This version updated existing recommendations for risk stratification, multimodal PONV prevention and treatment strategies for both adults and children, but also offers guidance of PONV within recovery pathways.28 Risk factors for PONV in pediatric patients are listed in Table 3. On average, children have twice the risk of developing PONV when compared with adults. The added risk for each additional PONV risk factor is 10%, 30%, 55%, and 70%, respectively.29 Avoiding or minimizing exposure to volatile anesthetics, anticholinesterases, and postoperative opioids may reduce baseline risk, with the pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacist playing an integral role of recommending non-opioid and opioid multimodal analgesic therapy options. Liberal fluid therapy (e.g., 30 mL/kg Lactated Ringer injection) may also reduce baseline risk of PONV.28 Antiemetic prophylaxis is recommended at all risk stratifications, but multimodal therapy with a 5HT3-antagonist and dexamethasone is recommended for medium and high-risk patients. Rescue treatment in the guideline includes droperidol, promethazine, and metoclopramide. However, the ISMP in the Targeted Medication Safety Best Practices from 2018–2019 recommended to eliminate injectable promethazine from hospitals.10 Promethazine injection has a black box warning for fatal respiratory depression in children younger than 2 years, and additionally can cause chemical irritation and severe tissue injury from perivascular extravasation or if given via intra-arterial injection. Moreover, dopamine antagonists (metoclopramide and promethazine) were featured in the Key Potentially Inappropriate Drugs in Pediatrics (KIDs List) with the recommendation to avoid intravenous use of these agents in infants and use caution in children owing to increased risk of respiratory depression, extravasation, and death.30 The pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacist can aid in the selection of patient-specific prophylactic PONV therapies by using the postoperative vomiting in children (POVOC) score and developing a risk mitigation and monitoring strategy for patients at high risk.29 Rescue antiemetics in children would include a 5HT3-antagonist (e.g., ondansetron, granisetron, or dolasetron), an antihistamine (e.g., dimenhydrinate), or low-dose droperidol, if not administered previously.

Table 3. Risk Factors for PONV in Pediatric Patients29
Table 3.

Pain and Analgesia

A major responsibility of those who care for children is eliminating or minimizing pain, when possible. Effective pain management involves an interdisciplinary team and includes pharmacologic, cognitive-behavioral, psychologic, and physical treatments.31 Early effective pain treatment in postsurgical patients is safer and more efficacious than delayed treatment and reduces discomfort and possibly total analgesic exposure. Pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacists are uniquely poised to assist with drug selection to maximize efficacy and minimize adverse effects.

There are several unique considerations for perioperative pain management in pediatric patients including differences in how to assess pain and an inability for younger or cognitively impaired patients to vocalize pain. Additionally, emergence delirium, a transient state of marked irritation and disassociation after the discontinuation of anesthesia, is 3 to 8 times more likely in the pediatric postsurgical patient than in adults.32 Anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, and opioids may precipitate emergence delirium. Often lasting 30 to 45 minutes after emergence, delirium complicates patient assessment for adequate pain control and comfort. Generally, non-pharmacologic measures should be used to help reorient the child to their surroundings, and inclusion of the caregivers in this process can be helpful. Once the child is making purposeful movements, responding appropriately to their caregivers, and speaking appropriately (if able to assess, based on the patient's age), the ability to accurately assess pain control increases. Those patients who are refractory to non-pharmacologic measures can be treated with either typical or atypical antipsychotics, such as intravenous haloperidol or oral quetiapine.33 The use of delirium scoring systems such as the pediatric Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (pCAM-ICU) or Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) may minimize exposure to antipsychotic agents.34

Pain Assessment. The appropriate scale to assess pain should be determined on the basis of the child's age, development, and institutional practice. There are numerous scales that exist to assess pain in neonatal and pediatrics patients (see Table 4).

Table 4. Examples of Pain Assessment Tools for Assessing Neonatal and Pediatric Patients
Table 4.

Pharmacologic Treatments Based on Pain Severity. Plans for postoperative pain management should be discussed with the family/caregivers prior to surgery, including anticipated type, route, and duration of pharmacologic treatment.31 Non-pharmacologic measures should be used in all patients when able because this may reduce the need for medications. Major classes of pharmacologic agents include opioids and non-opioid analgesics. Non-opioid analgesics, such as oral acetaminophen or oral ibuprofen, are likely adequate for procedures likely to produce only mild pain. Ibuprofen and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) are generally used with caution in children younger than 3 to 6 months owing to an increased risk of renal toxicity, especially in patients with short postoperative monitoring periods or quickly discharged home. While data are limited, newer evidence has been published supporting the safety of ibuprofen in infants as young as 3 months who weigh at least 5 kg.43,44 Ketorolac has been used safely in a variety of postoperative settings.45 Data supporting ketorolac use in post–cardiac surgery pediatric patients demonstrate safety and efficacy in full-term infants as young as 14 days of life, although data in premature infants are more limited.4648 NSAIDs are associated with risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, renal toxicity, and reversible platelet inhibition. Maintenance of adequate hydration, avoidance of other nephrotoxins, and caution with thrombocytopenia is recommended. There is also concern for delayed bone healing in orthopedic surgery patients due to decreasing prostaglandins, which promote bone healing, as well as anastomotic leak and dehiscence in gastrointestinal surgeries. While some data demonstrate this risk in adult patients, these risks have not been demonstrated in pediatric patients, although studies are limited.49,50

In addition to use in mild pain, non-opioid analgesics should be routinely recommended when not contraindicated to reduce opioid exposure in those with surgeries resulting in moderate or severe pain.31 These may be initiated in the preoperative or intraoperative periods. In addition to acetaminophen and NSAIDs, other non-opioids have also been studied in children for this indication with some success, including ketamine, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, and dexamethasone.51 Enhanced recovery programs often include multimodal pain management strategies that could lead to duplicate indications for as-needed pain medications. The Joint Commission and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recommend against therapeutic duplication, that is, use of 2 or more medications for the same indication. It is important for the pharmacist to keep in mind these standards of practice and intervene to avoid duplicate indications where more than 1 as-needed medication is prescribed for the same pain level score.

Common opioids used for moderate or severe pain include hydrocodone, morphine, fentanyl, and hydromorphone. Codeine, tramadol, and meperidine are not recommended for the postsurgical pediatric patient, as all 3 medications appear on KIDs List with concerns for respiratory depression.30,52,53 Codeine and tramadol are specifically contraindicated in those younger than 12 years for postoperative pain management or children younger than 18 years following tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. Oral options are preferred in moderate pain, when tolerated, and should start with the smallest effective dose with titration in small increments as necessary. Intravenous use is likely indicated in severe pain when regional analgesia is not appropriate or available. The most invasive surgeries will likely require continuous intravenous opioid infusions with additional intermittent opioid dosing. Careful attention should be paid to the dosing of opioids in children as well as the duration of effect, because this will affect the frequency of re-dosing. The ability to measure smaller doses in infants and young children can also be problematic, often requiring dilutions for younger patients or preference of one agent to another owing to the ability to measure doses. For example, a small volume of hydromorphone is typically required to administer an equi-effective dose owing to a higher concentration and potency, so morphine may be preferred in infants and small children owing to ease of measuring.

Adverse effects of each medication class should be anticipated and treated appropriately. These include assessment for pruritus and ensuring an adequate bowel regimen. Often combinations of polyethylene glycol 3350, sennasoids, and stool softeners are necessary to maintain bowel movements every 48 hours for those receiving opioid therapy. Observation of serious side effects, such as kidney injury from NSAIDs and respiratory depression from opioids, is also paramount. Intravenous naloxone should be readily available, such as in emergency carts or automated dispensing cabinets.54 Dosing for naloxone will vary depending on whether full or partial reversal for respiratory depression is needed. Typically, full opioid reversal (naloxone 0.1 mg/kg/dose up to 2 mg) is less preferred in the postoperative setting for patients with symptoms of respiratory depression, because this will lead to uncontrolled pain after administration. A smaller dose for reversal of respiratory depression (0.001 to 0.005 mg/kg/dose up to 0.08 mg) with re-dosing every 2 to 3 minutes allows for titration to effect and decreases complete opioid blockade.4,55

Patient-Controlled Analgesia. Opioids also may be given by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in children and adolescents who are able to reliably assess their own pain and properly activate the PCA device. The most common opioids given by PCA include fentanyl, morphine, and hydromorphone. PCA use after surgery has been shown to decrease pain intensity and improve patient satisfaction.56 Typically, 7 years is the youngest age for which PCA would be considered. PCA by proxy (i.e., parent or nurse-driven) analgesia in younger patients or those with cognitive impairment is controversial. It should only be used after significant education and institutional policies have been put in place to prevent inadvertent harm, including significant respiratory depression.54,57 In addition, pediatric capnography can be implemented as an additional layer of safety in the pediatric patient setting when using PCA.58

The settings of a PCA include the drug used, bolus dose, lockout interval, hourly maximum dose, and, optionally, the basal rate. Basal rate infusions are not routinely used and should be reserved only for children who are opioid tolerant or with severe pain in intensive care units. Ensuring safe PCA use is important to reduce side effects, and pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacists should be involved in the development of standardized practices and policies to prevent errors. A summary of safety concerns and potential solutions can be found in Table 5.

Table 5. Summary of Safety Concerns and Potential Solutions for PCA in Postoperative Children59
Table 5.

Local Anesthesia Nerve Blocks. Regional anesthesia, including neuraxial (e.g., peripheral, caudal, and spinal) nerve blocks and lumbar and thoracic epidurals, is an increasingly used modality in pediatric patients. Neuraxial nerve blocks are typically placed under general anesthesia to improve intra- and post-operative pain control; however, the increase of ultrasound-guided placement has expanded the use of this modality into other spaces (e.g., emergency department, procedural units). Peripheral nerve blocks can be placed as a single injection or given as a continuous infusion through a catheter to the nerve site. The choice of agent and concentration required depends on the type and location of the block being performed. Guidelines on dosing and product choice for various blocks in pediatric patients have recently been published.60 Local anesthetics can cause systemic toxicity (LAST) to the cardiac and central nervous systems. Signs of LAST include altered mental status, seizures, tremor, tachyarrhythmia, and cardiovascular collapse. Long-acting local anesthetics, such as bupivacaine and ropivacaine, have a greater propensity to cause systemic toxicity than lidocaine, and are a greater risk in infants younger than 6 months.61 Management of LAST is largely supportive and often warrants activation of emergency code response. In neurologic or cardiovascular emergencies, intravenous lipid emulsion boluses (1–1.5 mL/kg over 1 minute every 3 minutes up to 3 mL/kg) and continuous infusions (0.25 mg/kg/min of lipid emulsion 20% titrated to blood pressure) can be given to help bind the local anesthetic.62 Pharmacists working in perioperative spaces should collaborate with their anesthesia providers to determine when intravenous lipid emulsion should be administered and where it should be stored for emergent situations so that these clinical scenarios are safely managed immediately.

Anticoagulation

Anticoagulation needs of pediatric patients are diverse, thus the expertise of the pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacist is warranted. Some surgeries, such as those requiring cardiopulmonary bypass, require intraoperative anticoagulation. For patients maintained on anticoagulation before surgery, careful consideration must be made to balance the risks of bleeding during surgery with the risk of VTE. This requires withholding anticoagulants for the appropriate duration of time prior to surgery, and if this is not possible, use of emergent reversal of anticoagulation with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) infusion during surgery. Finally, prevention of VTE after surgery is an important consideration for all patients, and patients may require at-home anticoagulation for up to 28 days (usually 7–10 days), especially after cancer surgery.63

Perioperative Anticoagulation Management. Data and recommendations for perioperative management of systemic anticoagulation for pediatric patients are sparse, and most relevant data are found in cardiology and solid organ transplant. When managing pediatric patients, the pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacist must take into consideration adult literature and pediatric pharmacokinetics of various agents. For patients maintained on antithrombotic therapy, preoperative management depends on the elimination half-life of the anticoagulant and the reason for anticoagulation. The risk of thrombosis with the underlying condition must be considered when making the decision to withhold or bridge anticoagulation. The risk of bleeding, associated with the surgical procedure and any use of epidural anesthesia during or after the procedure, is the largest consideration when making the decision on bleeding risk. Bleeding risk is considered lowest with dermatologic procedures, biopsies, endoscopy, and dental surgeries and highest in those surgeries where bleeding in an enclosed space will cause significant morbidity, such as intracranial and spinal procedures.64 A list of commonly used anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents, their duration of effect, and approach to management can be found in Table 6. For patients receiving lumbar puncture (LP) in conjunction with surgery, it is important to consider the timing of LP and, if applicable, catheter removal in relation to anticoagulation. See Table 6 for the recommended time between anticoagulant dosing and LP or epidural catheter insertion or removal.65

Table 6. Recommendations for Anticoagulant Holding Prior to Lumbar Puncture and Anticoagulant Reversal Strategy6567
Table 6.

For patients receiving warfarin, bridging with an agent with a shorter half-life, such as low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH), may be necessary. The need for bridging depends on the risk of thrombosis in the absence of antithrombotic therapy. For minor procedures, anticoagulation may be able to be continued without cessation, while for most major procedures bridging is necessary. The CHEST guidelines recommend stopping warfarin 5 days before the planned procedure, and restarting therapy 12 to 24 hours after hemostasis is obtained post procedure.66 Given their shorter duration of effect, perioperative management of UFH and LMWH is accomplished by withholding the agent for the appropriate duration before and after surgery without need to bridge. It is recommended to withhold UFH for 4 to 6 hours before surgery, and restart it after hemostasis is obtained.66

The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in pediatric patients remains uncommon, although use in older adolescents, in sickle cell anemia, or in clinical trial participants is taking place in clinical practice.68 A pharmacokinetic approach to management of DOACs in the perioperative setting suggests they should be withheld for 1 to 2 days prior to surgery and restarted the day after surgery.69 For pediatric patients, adherence to clinical trial recommendations or consultation with a pediatric hematologist should be considered.

Antiplatelet agents in pediatric patients are mainly used in the cardiac population and thus procedural management is often specific to the procedure and underlying reason for antiplatelet therapy. The need to withhold antiplatelet therapy depends on the risk of thrombosis in the absence of therapy and the risk of bleeding with the procedure. The most commonly used antiplatelet agents in pediatric patients are aspirin and clopidogrel, both of which bind irreversibly to their respective targets and, thus, have a much longer duration of effect than the drug's elimination half-life. In most cases, aspirin can be safely continued; however, clinically relevant, non-major bleeding has been observed in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.64,66 For patients for whom aspirin can be safely withheld, it should be stopped 7 to 10 days before the procedure.64,66 For patients on clopidogrel, it should be stopped 5 days before the procedure.64,66

Emergent Reversal. For elective surgeries, reversal of anticoagulation typically can be accomplished by withholding anticoagulants for an appropriate duration as described above. However, in emergent situations, pharmacologic reversal of anticoagulation may be necessary. Reversal of anticoagulation is not without risk as it can be associated with a higher risk of thrombosis because of the inducement of a hypercoagulable state. Reversal of heparin-based anticoagulants is accomplished with protamine sulfate at a dose of 1 mg per 1 mg of enoxaparin or 100 units of heparin.70 Only heparin given in the past few hours should be neutralized, and dosing tables exist to calculate the amount of protamine needed given the time since heparin administration.70 The reversal agent of choice for warfarin depends on the immediacy of surgery and the threat of bleeding. For patients with elevated international normalized ratio (INR >8) without significant bleeding, reversal may be accomplished with parenteral vitamin K.71 When warfarin reversal is needed immediately, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or PCC can be used.67 Guidance and data on reversal of DOACs are limited to the adult population. DOAC reversal can be accomplished with PCC, FFP, or drug-specific reversal agents: idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal and andexanet alfa for reversal of apixaban and rivaroxaban.72 Guidance on reversal of antiplatelet agents is less well defined. The most commonly used antiplatelet agents, aspirin and clopidogrel, bind irreversibly to platelets, so exogenous platelet administration may be necessary in patients with significant bleeding.67

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism. In post-surgical patients, VTE is a well-known complication. In 2008, the US Surgeon General released a call-to-action to prevent VTE; however, application in pediatric patients has been slow, limited by a scarcity of quality data.73 Since this publication, the incidence of hospital-acquired VTE in children has increased, with surgery recognized as an important risk factor, and is estimated at 0.1% of the pediatric surgical population.7476 While the incidence of VTE in children is markedly lower than in adults, it remains the second largest cause of preventable harm in pediatric patients.77 The cost of hospital-acquired VTE in pediatric patients is estimated to be approximately USD $30,000 per episode and is driven by increased length of stay, laboratory testing, and increased drug costs.78 Institutions caring for children should have a standardized way of assessing VTE risk and providing appropriate prophylaxis. The Children's Hospitals Solutions for Patient Safety (CHSPS) recommends VTE risk in children be assessed at a minimum on admission, pre- and post-operatively, and upon transfer to a different level of care, highlighting the importance of this topic in perioperative care.77 For children 12 years or older who are undergoing an hour or more of general anesthesia, the CHSPS recommends the use of mechanical prophylaxis intraoperatively.77 Currently, the use of a risk-stratified approach dividing children into low, moderate, or high risk of VTE is the standard of care for determination of VTE prophylaxis strategies perioperatively77,79,80Table 7 provides a list of VTE risk factors and pharmacologic considerations when assessing risk and VTE in children. While which risk factors convey low, moderate, and high risk of VTE in pediatric patients differs among published guidelines, most recommend early ambulation for all pediatric patients, compression stockings for those with moderate or high VTE risk, and additional pharmacologic prophylaxis for high-risk patients.77,7981 Pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacists should advocate for the creation and maintenance of institutional guidelines for VTE prevention. Reminders to reassess the need for VTE prophylaxis should be built into perioperative transitions of care as well.

Table 7. Venous Thromboembolism Risk Factors and Pharmacologic Contraindications77,79
Table 7.

Unique Hematologic Considerations. Bleeding Disorders . The presence of inherited bleeding disorders is a challenge in the perioperative setting. The most common genetic disorders of bleeding are hemophilia A, caused by deficiency in factor VIII; hemophilia B, caused by deficiency in factor IX; and von Willebrand disease (VWD), caused by missing or defective von Willebrand factor (VWF). The pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacist caring for these patients should be familiar with hematologic management and ideally co-manage these patients with a hematologist. Management of these patients should be done at facilities with sufficient laboratory and blood bank support to monitor during procedures. The World Federation of Hemophilia recommends that procedures for patients with hemophilia take place early in the day so that maximal laboratory and supportive care staff are available in the immediate postoperative setting.82 Pharmacists must take particular care to ensure adequate inventories of relevant factor products while balancing the financial aspects of care. One strategy that may assist in balancing the financial aspect is using the patient's own medication supply in the perioperative setting when possible. The presence of a genetic bleeding disorder with adequate treatment is not an absolute contraindication to postoperative pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis and is a factor to consider when balancing the risks of bleeding and VTE development.

In patients with hemophilia who are undergoing surgery, it is important to consider the severity of hemophilia, home factor regimen, and history of inhibitor formation when developing a perioperative factor replacement plan. Hemophilia severity is classified according to baseline factor activity level: mild (5%–40%), moderate (1%–5%), or severe (<1%). While only patients with severe hemophilia are at risk of spontaneous bleeding and are likely to be maintained on prophylactic factor treatment in the absence of trauma, all patients with hemophilia are at risk of developing bleeding after surgery and should be treated with factor products.8284 See Table 8 for recommended factor level ranges. In general, 1 international unit/kg of factor VIII raises activity level by 2%, while 1 unit/kg of factor IX raises activity level by 1%; however, dosing should be confirmed by using the product-specific package insert.84 If bleeding risk is high in the immediate postoperative period, continuous infusion of factor may be necessary to maintain levels high enough to prevent bleeding or expansion of a hematoma. For patients with inhibitors, the use of bypassing agents may be necessary for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding. Activated prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) can be used for hemophilia A with inhibitors, and rFVIIa is used for hemophilia B with inhibitors.84 Factor VIII and factor IX activity can be monitored directly; however, turnaround time for these tests is usually at least 1 to 2 hours. In patients with hemophilia with low factor activity, activated partial thromboplastin time and activated clotting time are also prolonged, which may provide a more immediate assessment of clotting ability.

Table 8. Recommended Factor Concentration in the Perioperative Period82
Table 8.

Perioperative management of patients with VWD is less well defined. There are multiple subtypes of VWD. Type 1 is caused by partial quantitative deficiency of VWF, type 2 by qualitative deficiency of VWF, and type 3 by total deficiency of VWF. Patients with VWD may have lower concentrations of factor VIII because VWF is necessary to stabilize factor VIII in plasma. This decrease in factor VIII is most severe in VWD type 3. Intravenous or intranasal desmopressin can be used prior to an invasive procedure to transiently correct VWF and factor VIII concentrations in patients with type 1 and some patients with type 2 disease by inducing release of VWF from endothelial cells. Types 2B and type 3 VWD are typically unresponsive to desmopressin.85 Use of desmopressin to manage VWD is typically not recommended in patients with underlying heart disease. Fluid restriction to avoid hyponatremia may be warranted, and close monitoring of electrolytes with supplementation should be performed in all patients receiving desmopressin.85 Desmopressin is typically administered for no more than 5 days. In all patients receiving major surgery and those undergoing minor surgery who have VWD types unresponsive to desmopressin, VWF concentrates should be used. It is important to note that available VWF concentrates have varied levels of factor VIII relative to VWF, and both must be considered when providing factor replacement.85,86 Care must be taken not to oversupplement factor VII relative to VWF because factor VIII concentrations over 150% increase risk of thrombosis.85 Careful monitoring of VWF and factor VIII is recommended.

Religious Refusal of Blood Transfusions . Some religious faiths, such as Jehovah's Witnesses, oppose the use of blood transfusions, which can make blood loss in the perioperative setting challenging to manage. Except in emergencies, parental consent to transfuse pediatric patients is required, and in patients with postsurgical blood loss, this can present an ethical challenge. In situations where the life of the child is at risk, the medical team can act together with the court to transfuse the child without the parents' permission, but this type of action should be avoided whenever possible.87 With careful planning, even pediatric cardiac surgeries requiring cardiopulmonary bypass have been performed without the use of blood products.8890 Care of these patients in accordance with their religious belief involves minimizing blood loss during surgery, enhancing erythropoiesis, and correcting coagulation defects and promoting hemostasis.91 Patients with religious objections to blood transfusion should be screened for anemia at least 4 weeks prior to surgery and treated according to the underlying cause. Optimization of iron status, as well as supplementation with vitamin C, folate, and vitamin B12, are all recommended. The use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents in both the pre- and post-surgical settings to increase erythropoiesis has been used successfully; however, data are largely limited to case reports and small case series.89,90,92,93 Olshove et al89 reported a preoperative regimen of erythropoietin 500 units/kg twice a week, along with multivitamin, supplemental iron, vitamin C, vitamin D, thiamine, and folic acid, which achieved a preoperative hematocrit of 46.1%, as effective in preventing transfusion in 5 pediatric congenital heart patients. Optimal dosing and duration of erythropoietin, as well as recommended presurgical hemoglobin and hematocrit targets, have not been established for pediatric patients; however, a hemoglobin concentration lower than 13 g/dL has been used as a marker for preoperative anemia for adults. Erythropoietin management should be performed by the pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacist in conjunction with pediatric hematology, based on the most recent evidence. Minimizing blood loss by optimizing coagulation is necessary to limit need for transfusion. The pediatric perioperative pharmacist should recommend cessation of any drugs that can potentiate bleeding such as NSAIDs, anticoagulants, antiplatelets, and herbal remedies (especially garlic-, ginkgo-, green tea extract–, and ginger-containing products) before surgery, when possible. The use of tranexamic acid and replacement of specific clotting factors, using recombinant products, has been recommended for adult patients and use in pediatric patients has been reported.91,94

Special Populations

There are many additional unique considerations in various pediatric surgery types that are not specifically addressed in the prior sections. While not fully comprehensive, a list of some medication-specific considerations for the most common pediatric surgery types can be found in Table 9.

Table 9. Special Pediatric Perioperative Medication Considerations
Table 9.
Table 9. Special Pediatric Perioperative Medication Considerations
Table 9.

Conclusion

The pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacist is uniquely poised to provide pharmacotherapy and medication use expertise across the perioperative continuum of care. This review provides a general summary of considerations and recommendations for the pediatric perioperative pharmacist concerning enhanced recovery pathways, fluids and electrolytes, antimicrobials, PONV, pain and analgesia, anticoagulation, and selected surgery types. Pediatric perioperative clinical pharmacists should ensure they have adequate knowledge of these specific pediatric physiologic and pharmacotherapeutic considerations and are able to apply and extrapolate evidence-based medicine in children to ensure the safety and best possible outcomes of the pediatric surgical patient.

ABBREVIATIONS

ASHP

American Society of Health-System Pharmacists

CAPD

Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium

CHSPS

Children's Hospitals Solutions for Patient Safety

DOAC

direct oral anticoagulant

ERP

enhanced recovery pathway

FFP

fresh frozen plasma

INR

international normalized ratio

ISMP

Institute for Safe Medication Practices

KIDs List

Key Potentially Inappropriate Drugs in Pediatrics

LAST

local anesthetics systemic toxicity

LMWH

low-molecular-weight heparin

LP

lumbar puncture

NSAID

non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication

PCA

patient-controlled analgesia

pCAM-ICU

pediatric Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit

PCC

prothrombin complex concentrate

PONV

postoperative nausea and vomiting

POVOC

postoperative vomiting in children

PPA

Pediatric Pharmacy Association

rFVIIa

recombinant activated factor VII

UFH

unfractionated heparin

VTE

venous thromboembolism

VWD

von Willebrand disease

VWF

von Willebrand factor

References

  • 1.
    Pearson KL, Hall NJ. What is the role of enhanced recovery after surgery in children: a scoping review. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017;33(
    1
    ):4351.
  • 2.
    Lovely JK, Hyland SJ, Smith AN, et al.. Clinical pharmacist perspectives for optimizing pharmacotherapy within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) programs. Int J Surg. 2019;63:5862.
  • 3.
    Patel GP, Hyland SJ, Birrer KL, et al.. Perioperative clinical pharmacy practice: responsibilities and scope within the surgical care continuum. J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2020;3(
    2
    ):501519.
  • 4.
    Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al.. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2010;122(
    18 suppl 3
    ):S876S908.
  • 5.
    Benavidas S, Nahata MC , eds.Pediatric Pharmacotherapy.
    1st ed
    .
    Lenexa, KS
    :
    American College of Clinical Pharmacy
    ; 2013.
  • 6.
    van den Anker J, Reed MD, Allegaert K, Kearns GL. Developmental changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;58 (
    suppl 10
    ):S10S25.
  • 7.
    Van Der Heggen T, Dhont E, Peperstraete H, et al.. Augmented renal clearance: a common condition in critically ill children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019;34(
    6
    ):10991106.
  • 8.
    McBane SE, Coon SA, Anderson KC, et al.. Rational and irrational use of nonsterile compounded medications. J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2019;2(
    2
    ):189197.
  • 9.
    American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Standardize 4 Safety Initiative. 2021. Accessed January 13, 2021. https://www.ashp.org/Pharmacy-Practice/Standardize-4-Safety-Initiative
  • 10.
    Institute for Safe Medication Practices. ISMP targeted medication safety best practices for hospitals – 2020-2021. 2019. Accessed January 14, 2021. https://www.ismp.org/sites/default/files/attachments/2020-02/2020-2021%20TMSBP-%20FINAL_1.pdf
  • 11.
    Institute for Safe Medication Practices. ISMP Guideline for the Safe Use of Automated Dispensing Cabinets. 2019. Accessed January 13, 2021. www.ismp.org/system/files/resources/2019-11/ISMP170-ADC%20Guideline-020719_final.pdf
  • 12.
    Eiland LS, Benner K, Gumpper KF, et al.. ASHP-PPAG Guidelines for providing pediatric pharmacy services in hospitals and health systems. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018;75(
    15
    ):11511165.
  • 13.
    Brindle M, Nelson G, Lobo DN, et al.. Recommendations from the ERAS® Society for standards for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines. BJS Open. 2020;4(
    1
    ):157163.
  • 14.
    Rove KO, Edney JC, Brockel MA. Enhanced recovery after surgery in children: promising, evidence-based multidisciplinary care. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018;28(
    6
    ):482492.
  • 15.
    Gibb ACN, Crosby MA, McDiarmid C, et al.. Creation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guideline for neonatal intestinal surgery patients: a knowledge synthesis and consensus generation approach and protocol study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(
    12
    ):e023651.
  • 16.
    Brindle ME, Heiss K, Scott MJ, et al.. Embracing change: the era for pediatric ERAS is here. Pediatr Surg Int. 2019;35(
    6
    ):631634.
  • 17.
    Johnson E, Parrish R, II Nelson G, et al.. Expanding pharmacotherapy data collection, analysis, and implementation in ERAS(®) programs-the methodology of an exploratory feasibility study. Healthcare (Basel). 2020;8(
    3
    ):252.
  • 18.
    Lex DJ, Tóth R, Czobor NR, et al.. Fluid overload is associated with higher mortality and morbidity in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016;17(
    4
    ):307314.
  • 19.
    Feld LG, Neuspiel DR, Foster BA, et al.. Clinical practice guideline: maintenance intravenous fluids in children. Pediatrics. 2018;142(
    6
    ):e20183083
  • 20.
    Brady M, Kinn S, Ness V, et al.. Preoperative fasting for preventing perioperative complications in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009(
    4
    ):Cd005285.
  • 21.
    Holliday MA, Segar WE. The maintenance need for water in parenteral fluid therapy. Pediatrics. 1957;19(
    5
    ):823832.
  • 22.
    McNaull P, Suchar A. Fluids, electrolytes, and nutrition. In:AndropoulosDB,GregoryGA, eds.Gregory's Pediatric Anesthesia.
    6th ed
    .
    Hoboken, NJ
    :
    Wiley-Blackwell
    ; 2020:226246.
  • 23.
    Bailey AG, McNaull PP, Jooste E, Tuchman JB. Perioperative crystalloid and colloid fluid management in children: where are we and how did we get here? Anesth Analg . 2010;110(
    2
    ):375390.
  • 24.
    Diab YA, Wong EC, Luban NL. Massive transfusion in children and neonates. Br J Haematol. 2013;161(
    1
    ):1526.
  • 25.
    Leelanukrom R, Cunliffe M. Intraoperative fluid and glucose management in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2000;10(
    4
    ):353359.
  • 26.
    Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al.. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70(
    3
    ):195283.
  • 27.
    Laituri C, Arnold MA. A standardized guideline for antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical neonates. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2019;28(
    1
    ):5356.
  • 28.
    Gan TJ, Belani KG, Bergese S, et al.. Fourth consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2020;131(
    2
    ):411448.
  • 29.
    Eberhart LHJ, Geldner G, Kranke P, et al.. The development and validation of a risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(
    6
    ):16301637.
  • 30.
    Meyers RS, Thackray J, Matson KL, et al.. Key potentially inappropriate drugs in pediatrics: the KIDs list. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2020;25(
    3
    ):175191.
  • 31.
    American Academy of Pediatrics; Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health; Task Force on Pain in Infants, Children, and Adolescents. The assessment and management of acute pain in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2001;108(
    3
    ):793797.
  • 32.
    Stamper MJ, Hawks SJ, Taicher BM, et al.. Identifying pediatric emergence delirium by using the PAED Scale: a quality improvement project. AORN J. 2014;99(
    4
    ):480494.
  • 33.
    Thom RP. Pediatric delirium. Am J Psychiatry Resid J. 2017;12(
    2
    ):68.
  • 34.
    Kudchadkar SR, Yaster M, Punjabi NM. Sedation, sleep promotion, and delirium screening practices in the care of mechanically ventilated children: a wake-up call for the pediatric critical care community. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(
    7
    ):15921600.
  • 35.
    Stevens B, Johnston C, Petryshen P, Taddio A. Premature Infant Pain Profile: development and initial validation. Clin J Pain. 1996;12(
    1
    ):1322.
  • 36.
    Krechel SW, Bildner J. CRIES: a new neonatal postoperative pain measurement score: initial testing of validity and reliability. Paediatr Anaesth. 1995;5(
    1
    ):5361.
  • 37.
    Hummel P, Puchalski M, Creech SD, Weiss MG. Clinical reliability and validity of the N-PASS: neonatal pain, agitation and sedation scale with prolonged pain. J Perinatol. 2008;28(
    1
    ):5560.
  • 38.
    Lawrence J, Alcock D, McGrath P, et al.. The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain. Neonatal Netw. 1993;12(
    6
    ):5966.
  • 39.
    Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Burke C, et al.. The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16(
    3
    ):258265.
  • 40.
    Wong DL, Baker CM. Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs. 1988;14(
    1
    ):917.
  • 41.
    Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford PA, et al.. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain. 2001;93(
    2
    ):173183.
  • 42.
    Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974;2(
    7889
    ):11271131.
  • 43.
    Ziesenitz VC, Zutter A, Erb TO, van den Anker JN. Efficacy and safety of ibuprofen in infants aged between 3 and 6 months. Paediatr Drugs. 2017;19(
    4
    ):277290.
  • 44.
    Walsh P, Rothenberg SJ, Bang H. Safety of ibuprofen in infants younger than six months: a retrospective cohort study. PloS One. 2018;13(
    6
    ):e0199493.
  • 45.
    McNicol ED, Rowe E, Cooper TE. Ketorolac for postoperative pain in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7(
    7
    ):Cd012294.
  • 46.
    Moffett BS, Wann TI, Carberry KE, Mott AR. Safety of ketorolac in neonates and infants after cardiac surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16(
    4
    ):424428.
  • 47.
    Dawkins TN, Barclay CA, Gardiner RL, Krawczeski CD. Safety of intravenous use of ketorolac in infants following cardiothoracic surgery. Cardiol Young. 2009;19(
    1
    ):105108.
  • 48.
    Savva DA, Kishk OA, Morgan JA, et al.. Post-operative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use for pain in infant and paediatric cardiac surgery patients. Cardiol Young. 2019;29(
    12
    ):14401444.
  • 49.
    Sheffer BW, Kelly DM, Rhodes LN, Sawyer JR. Perioperative pain management in pediatric spine surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 2017;48(
    4
    ):481486.
  • 50.
    Wu JP. Pediatric anesthesia concerns and management for orthopedic procedures. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2020;67(
    1
    ):7184.
  • 51.
    Zhu A, Benzon HA, Anderson TA. Evidence for the efficacy of systemic opioid-sparing analgesics in pediatric surgical populations: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(
    5
    ):15691587.
  • 52.
    Latta KS, Ginsberg B, Barkin RL. Meperidine: a critical review. Am J Ther. 2002;9(
    1
    ):5368.
  • 53.
    US Food & Drug Administration. FDA restricts use of prescription codeine pain and cough medicines and tramadol pain medicines in children; recommends against use in breastfeeding women. 2017. Accessed November 22, 2021. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/UCM553814.pdf
  • 54.
    Cravero JP, Agarwal R, Berde C, et al.. The Society for Pediatric Anesthesia recommendations for the use of opioids in children during the perioperative period. Paediatr Anaesth. 2019;29(
    6
    ):547571.
  • 55.
    Hegenbarth MA. Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics. 2008;121(
    2
    ):433443.
  • 56.
    McNicol ED, Ferguson MC, Hudcova J. Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus non-patient controlled opioid analgesia for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(
    6
    ):Cd003348.
  • 57.
    Monitto CL, Greenberg RS, Kost-Byerly S, et al.. The safety and efficacy of parent-/nurse-controlled analgesia in patients less than six years of age. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(
    3
    ):573579.
  • 58.
    Eipe N, Doherty DR. A review of pediatric capnography. J Clin Monit Comput. 2010;24(
    4
    ):261268.
  • 59.
    Ocay DD, Otis A, Teles AR, Ferland CE. Safety of patient-controlled analgesia after surgery in children and adolescents: concerns and potential solutions. Front Pediatr. 2018;6:336.
  • 60.
    Suresh S, Ecoffey C, Bosenberg A, et al.. The European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy/ American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine recommendations on local anesthetics and adjuvants dosage in pediatric regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(
    2
    ):211216.
  • 61.
    Oda Y. Pharmacokinetics and systemic toxicity of local anesthetics in children. J Anesth. 2016;30(
    4
    ):547550.
  • 62.
    Lönnqvist PA. Toxicity of local anesthetic drugs: a pediatric perspective. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(
    1
    ):3943.
  • 63.
    Farge D, Debourdeau P, Beckers M, et al.. International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(
    1
    ):5670.
  • 64.
    Oprea AD, Popescu WM. Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(
    suppl 1
    ):i3i17.
  • 65.
    Dodd KC, Emsley HCA, Desborough MJR, Chhetri SK. Periprocedural antithrombotic management for lumbar puncture: Association of British Neurologists clinical guideline. Pract Neurol. 2018;18(
    6
    ):436446.
  • 66.
    Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Spencer FA, et al.. Peri-operative management of antithrombotic therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(
    2 suppl
    ):e326Se350S.
  • 67.
    Simon EM, Streitz MJ, Sessions DJ, Kaide CG. Anticoagulation reversal. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2018;36(
    3
    ):585601.
  • 68.
    Male C, Lensing AWA, Palumbo JS, et al.. Rivaroxaban compared with standard anticoagulants for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in children: a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7(
    1
    ):e18e27.
  • 69.
    Tafur A, Douketis J. Perioperative management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy. Heart. 2018;104(
    17
    ):14611467.
  • 70.
    Protamine [package insert on the Internet]. Revised 2019.
    Lake Zurich, IL
    :
    Fresenius Kabi USA
    ; 2000.
  • 71.
    Monagle P, Chan AKC, Goldenberg NA, et al.. Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(
    2 suppl
    ):e737Se801S.
  • 72.
    Cuker A, Burnett A, Triller D, et al.. Reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: Guidance from the Anticoagulation Forum. Am J Hematol. 2019;94(
    6
    ):697709.
  • 73.
    Office of the Surgeon General (US); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US). The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism .
    Rockville, MD
    :
    Office of the Surgeon General (US)
    ; 2008.
  • 74.
    Raffini L, Huang YS, Witmer C, Feudtner C. Dramatic increase in venous thromboembolism in children's hospitals in the United States from 2001 to 2007. Pediatrics. 2009;124(
    4
    ):10011008.
  • 75.
    Mahajerin A, Jaffray J, Branchford B, et al.. Comparative validation study of risk assessment models for pediatric hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(
    3
    ):633641.
  • 76.
    Jaffray J, Branchford B, Goldenberg N, et al.. Development of a risk model for pediatric hospital-acquired thrombosis: a report from the Children's Hospital-Acquired Thrombosis Consortium. J Pediatr. 2021;228:252259.e251.
  • 77.
    Witmer C, Davis D, Branchford B, et al.. Children's hospitals solutions for patient safety recommended bundles. 2016. Accessed October 24, 2020. http://www.solutionsforpatientsafety.org/wp-content/uploads/SPS-Recommended-Bundles.pdf
  • 78.
    Branchford B. Clinical and financial impact of HACs: a commentary on clinical and financial costs of hospital-acquired conditions. Transl Pediatr. 2015;4(
    4
    ):331333.
  • 79.
    Branchford BR, Betensky M, Goldenberg NA. Pediatric issues in thrombosis and hemostasis: the how and why of venous thromboembolism risk stratification in hospitalized children. Thromb Res. 2018;172:190193.
  • 80.
    Faustino EV, Raffini LJ. Prevention of hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism in children: a review of published guidelines. Front Pediatr. 2017;5:9.
  • 81.
    Meier KA, Clark E, Tarango C, et al.. Venous thromboembolism in hospitalized adolescents: an approach to risk assessment and prophylaxis. Hosp Pediatr. 2015;5(
    1
    ):4451.
  • 82.
    Srivastava A, Brewer AK, Mauser-Bunschoten EP, et al.. Guidelines for the management of hemophilia. Haemophilia. 2013;19(
    1
    ):e1e47.
  • 83.
    Franchini M, Mannucci PM. Hemophilia A in the third millennium. Blood Rev. 2013;27(
    4
    ):179184.
  • 84.
    Kwak J, Mazzeffi M, Boggio LN, et al.. Hemophilia: a review of perioperative management for cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36(
    1
    ):246257.
  • 85.
    Miesbach W, Berntorp E. Von Willebrand disease: the ‘dos' and ‘don'ts' in surgery. Eur J Haematol. 2017;98(
    2
    ):121127.
  • 86.
    Michiels JJ, van Vliet HH, Berneman Z, et al.. Managing patients with von Willebrand disease type 1, 2 and 3 with desmopressin and von Willebrand factor-factor VIII concentrate in surgical settings. Acta Haematol. 2009;121(
    2–3
    ):167176.
  • 87.
    Woolley S. Children of Jehovah's Witnesses and adolescent Jehovah's Witnesses: what are their rights? Arch Dis Child . 2005;90(
    7
    ):715719.
  • 88.
    Allen J, Berrios L, Solimine M, Knott-Craig CJ. Bloodless surgery in a pediatric Jehovah's Witness. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013;45(
    4
    ):251253.
  • 89.
    Olshove V, Berndsen N, Sivarajan V, et al.. Comprehensive blood conservation program in a new congenital cardiac surgical program allows bloodless surgery for the Jehovah Witness and a reduction for all patients. Perfusion. 2018;33(
    3
    ):194202.
  • 90.
    Plancher G, Datt B, Nguyen M, et al.. Bloodless heart surgery for an 11-kg infant of the Jehovah's Witness faith undergoing second repair for complete atrioventricular canal. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2018;50(
    3
    ):184186.
  • 91.
    Lawson T, Ralph C. Perioperative Jehovah's Witnesses: a review. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(
    5
    ):676687.
  • 92.
    Ratliff TM, Hodge AB, Preston TJ, et al.. Bloodless pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass for a 3.2-kg patient whose parents are of Jehovah's Witness faith. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2014;46(
    2
    ):173176.
  • 93.
    Reddy SK, Swink JM, Rogers GF, et al.. Transfusion-free calvarial vault reconstruction using multimodal blood conservation strategies in two pediatric Jehovah's Witness patients with craniosynostosis. A A Case Rep. 2016;7(
    2
    ):3336.
  • 94.
    Crowe EP, DeSimone RA. Transfusion support and alternatives for Jehovah's Witness patients. Curr Opin Hematol. 2019;26(
    6
    ):473479.
  • 95.
    Green ML, Koch J. Adrenocortical function in the postoperative pediatric cardiac surgical patient. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012;24(
    3
    ):285290.
  • 96.
    Graham EM, Atz AM, McHugh KE, et al.. Preoperative steroid treatment does not improve markers of inflammation after cardiac surgery in neonates: results from a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(
    3
    ):902908.
  • 97.
    Crawford JH, Hull MS, Borasino S, et al.. Adrenal insufficiency in neonates after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Paediatr Anaesth. 2017;27(
    1
    ):7784.
  • 98.
    Hill KD, Baldwin HS, Bichel DP, et al.. Rationale and design of the STeroids to REduce Systemic inflammation after infant heart Surgery (STRESS) trial. Am Heart J. 2020;220:192202.
  • 99.
    Hatami F, Valizadeh N, Salehi F, Hosseinzadeh Maleki M. Topical versus low-dose systemic tranexamic acid in pediatric cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical study. J Card Surg. 2020;35(
    12
    ):33683373.
  • 100.
    Maeda T, Sasabuchi Y, Matsui H, et al.. Safety of tranexamic acid in pediatric cardiac surgery: a nationwide database study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017;31(
    2
    ):549553.
  • 101.
    Su F, Nicolson SC, Zuppa AF. A dose-response study of dexmedetomidine administered as the primary sedative in infants following open heart surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14(
    5
    ):499507.
  • 102.
    Ortmann LA, Keshary M, Bisselou KS, et al.. Association between postoperative dexmedetomidine use and arrhythmias in infants after cardiac surgery. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2019;10(
    4
    ):440445.
  • 103.
    Barbaro RP, Paden ML, Guner YS, et al.. Pediatric Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry International Report 2016. ASAIO J. 2017;63(
    4
    ):456463.
  • 104.
    Guner Y, Jancelewicz T, Di Nardo M, et al.. Management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia treated with extracorporeal life support: interim guidelines consensus statement from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. ASAIO J. 2021;67(
    2
    ):113120.
  • 105.
    Putnam LR, Tsao K, Morini F, et al.. Evaluation of variability in inhaled nitric oxide use and pulmonary hypertension in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(
    12
    ):11881194.
  • 106.
    Mazuski JE, Tessier JM, May AK, et al.. The Surgical Infection Society revised guidelines on the management of intra-abdominal infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017;18(
    1
    ):176.
  • 107.
    Worthington P, Balint J, Bechtold M, et al.. When is parenteral nutrition appropriate?JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017;41(
    3
    ):324377.
  • 108.
    Shah SA, Guidry R, Kumar A, et al.. Current trends in pediatric spine deformity surgery: multimodal pain management and rapid recovery. Global Spine J. 2020;10(
    3
    ):346352.
  • 109.
    Bebawy JF. Perioperative steroids for peritumoral intracranial edema: a review of mechanisms, efficacy, and side effects. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2012;24(
    3
    ):173177.
  • 110.
    Malbari F, Staggers KA, Minard CG, et al.. Provider views on perioperative steroid use for patients with newly diagnosed pediatric brain tumors. J Neurooncol. 2020;147(
    1
    ):205212.
  • 111.
    Yeliosof O, Gangat M. Diagnosis and management of hypopituitarism. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019;31(
    4
    ):531536.
  • 112.
    Jiménez R, Casado-Flores J, Nieto M, García-Teresa MA. Cerebral salt wasting syndrome in children with acute central nervous system injury. Pediatr Neurol. 2006;35(
    4
    ):261263.
  • 113.
    Murphy RF, Williams D, Hogue GD, et al.. Prophylaxis for pediatric venous thromboembolism: current status and changes across Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America from 2011. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28(
    9
    ):388394.
  • 114.
    Stewart DW, Freshour JE. Aspirin for the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic events in orthopedic surgery patients: a comparison of the AAOS and ACCP guidelines with review of the evidence. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47(
    1
    ):6374.
  • 115.
    Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(
    suppl 3
    ):S1S155.
  • 116.
    Costanzo MR, Dipchand A, Starling R, et al.. The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29(
    8
    ):914956.
  • 117.
    Mysore KR, Himes RW, Rana A, et al.. ABO-incompatible deceased donor pediatric liver transplantation: novel titer-based management protocol and outcomes. Pediatr Transplant. 2018;22(
    7
    ):e13263.
  • 118.
    Goobie SM, Faraoni D. Tranexamic acid and perioperative bleeding in children: what do we still need to know? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol . 2019;32(
    3
    ):343352.
  • 119.
    American Academy of Pediatrics; Committee on Infectious Diseases. Red Book: 2018–2021 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases .
    31st ed
    .
    Elk Grove Village, IL
    :
    American Academy of Pediatrics
    ; 2018.
  • 120.
    Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Preventing pneumococcal disease among infants and young children: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2000;49(
    Rr-9
    ):135.
  • 121.
    Pham TN, Cancio LC, Gibran NS. American Burn Association practice guidelines burn shock resuscitation. J Burn Care Res. 2008;29(
    1
    ):257266.
  • 122.
    Jeschke MG, Herndon DN. Burns in children: standard and new treatments. Lancet. 2014;383(
    9923
    ):11681178
  • 123.
    Williams FN, Herndon DN, Kulp GA, Jeschke MG. Propranolol decreases cardiac work in a dose-dependent manner in severely burned children. Surgery. 2011;149(
    2
    ):231239.
  • 124.
    Herndon DN, Rodriguez NA, Diaz EC, et al.. Long-term propranolol use in severely burned pediatric patients: a randomized controlled study. Ann Surg. 2012;256(
    3
    ):402411.
    Disclosures. The authors declare no conflicts or financial interest in any product or service mentioned in the manuscript, including grants, equipment, medications, employment, gifts, and honoraria except the following: Consultant, LexiComp (EJB and GP); Consultant Slayback Pharma, LLC (GP); Advisory Boards of Slayback Pharma, LLC, and Emergent Biosolutions, Inc (RHP) Disclaimer. This paper represents the opinion of the Pediatrics and Perioperative Care Practice and Research Networks of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP). It does not necessarily represent an official ACCP commentary, guideline, or statement of policy or position. Ethical Approval and Informed Consent. Given the nature of this study, institutional review board/ethics committee review and informed consent were not required.
Copyright: Pediatric Pharmacy Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, email: 2022

Contributor Notes

Correspondence. Elizabeth J. Beckman, PharmD; elizabeth.beckman@uky.edu
Received: 20 Jul 2021
Accepted: 24 Nov 2021
  • Download PDF