Volume 25: Issue 6

The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists have recently published revised guidelines for the therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin. Previous iterations of the guideline largely focused on targeting vancomycin trough concentrations (VTCs) in the range of 15 to 20 mg/L for therapeutic efficacy. The revised guidelines shift the focus of therapeutic monitoring directly to AUC/MIC-based therapeutic monitoring for children, with a suggestion of a goal AUC/MIC 400 to 800. The primary hesitation in applying these recommendations to children stems from the absence of pediatric clinical data demonstrating correlations with clinical outcomes and either VTC or AUC and no benefit in other secondary outcomes (e.g., recurrence, duration of bacteremia). One can glean indirectly from this that such aggressive dosing and monitoring strategies are unnecessary to achieve therapeutic success in the majority of children with serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Providers should carefully weigh the potential unknown benefits of targeting vancomycin AUC 400 to 800 mg*hr/L in children with the known risks of acute kidney injury associated with increasing the dose of vancomycin as well as the substantial time, effort, and costs of this process.

Late-onset sepsis in neonates can lead to significant morbidity and mortality, especially in preterm infants. Vancomycin is commonly prescribed for the treatment of Gram-positive organisms, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), coagulase-negative staphylococci, and ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus species in adult and pediatric patients. Currently, there is no consensus on optimal dosing and monitoring of vancomycin in neonates. Different vancomycin dosing regimens exist for neonates, but with many of these regimens, obtaining therapeutic trough concentrations can be difficult. In 2011, the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommended vancomycin trough concentrations of 15 to 20 mg/L or an AUC/MIC ratio of ≥400 for severe invasive diseases (e.g., MRSA) in adult and pediatric patients. Owing to recent reports of increased risk of nephrotoxicity associated with vancomycin trough concentrations of 15 to 20 mg/L and AUC/MIC of ≥400, a revised consensus guideline, recently published in 2020, no longer recommends monitoring vancomycin trough concentrations in adult patients. The guideline recommends an AUC/MIC of 400 to 600, which has been found to achieve clinical efficacy while reducing nephrotoxicity. However, these recommendations were derived solely from adult literature, as there are limited clinical outcomes data in pediatric and neonatal patients. Furthermore, owing to the variation of vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters among the neonatal population, these recommendations for achieving vancomycin AUC/MIC of 400 to 600 in neonates require further investigation. This review will discuss the challenges of achieving optimal vancomycin dosing and monitoring in neonatal patients.

The first plant-derived, purified pharmaceutical-grade cannabidiol (CBD) medication, Epidiolex, was approved in the United States by the FDA on June 25, 2018. Its approval for patients ≥ 2 years of age with Dravet syndrome (DS) or Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) markedly altered the treatment of medically refractory seizures in these disorders. This state-of-the-art review will discuss the history of CBD, its current pharmacology and toxicology, evidence supporting its use in a variety of epileptic syndromes, common side effects and adverse effects, and pharmacokinetically based drug-drug interactions. Owing to the importance in considering side effects, adverse effects, and drug-drug interactions in patients with medically refractory epilepsy syndromes, this review will take a deeper look into the nuances of the above within a clinical context, as compared to the other antiepileptic medications. Furthermore, despite the limited data regarding clinically significant drug-drug interactions, potential pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with CBD and other antiepileptics are theorized on the basis of their metabolic pathways. The article will further elucidate future research in terms of long-term efficacy, safety, and drug interactions that is critical to addressing unanswered questions relevant to clinical practice.

To the Editor

As pediatric pharmacists and residency program directors, we read with interest the article by Shaddix et al¹ outlining the advantages and disadvantages of pediatric-focused and traditional postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) pharmacy residencies. Which program is the right fit is a question every student needs to answer when evaluating PGY1 residencies. In addition to the points outlined in the recent article, we believe there are several other considerations when deciding which program best prepares one for a postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) pediatric pharmacy residency and a career in pediatrics.

The authors group PGY1 programs into “pediatric-focused”